<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/2008/08/new-licensing-confusion.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:forums.movabletype.org,2011://24/tag:forums.movabletype.org,2008://24.7175-</id>
  <updated>2011-09-01T02:28:25Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for new licensing confusion</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.292</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:forums.movabletype.org,2008://24.7175</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/2008/08/new-licensing-confusion.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.movabletype.org/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=24/entry_id=7175" title="new licensing confusion" />
    <published>2008-08-14T18:59:45Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-24T15:53:52Z</updated>
    <title>new licensing confusion</title>
    <summary>I must say the options available in my &quot;Movable Type Account&quot; screen is hella confusing as well. I thought we were down to MT, MT Pro, MT Enterprise. Yet in my account I see: Movable Type 4.2, Commercial License, 5...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Neil Epstein</name>
      <uri>http://gothamist.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Pricing and Licensing" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://forums.movabletype.org/">
      <![CDATA[<p>I must say the options available in my "Movable Type Account" screen is hella confusing as well.</p>

<p>I thought we were down to MT, MT Pro, MT Enterprise.</p>

<p>Yet in my account I see:</p>

<p>Movable Type 4.2, Commercial License, 5 Authors (for ProNet Members) <br />
Movable Type 4.2, Community Solution, Custom License</p>

<p>Aren't these both now just MT Pro?</p>

<p>When I installed the first option I have this in my MT footer:
Movable Type Commercial version 4.2-en with: Professional Pack 1.2</p>

<p>A colleague installed the MT Pro from the main download area and has
Movable Type Pro version 4.2-en with: Community Pack 1.6, Professional Pack 1.2</p>

<p>It just seems this simplifying to MT Pro isn't completely updated in all locations - and now I'm curious if I should just download the Pro option from the main page and forget about what is in my MT Account?</p>

<p>neil</p>
]]>
      

    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:forums.movabletype.org,2008://24.7175-comment:6039</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:forums.movabletype.org,2008://24.7175" type="text/html" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/2008/08/new-licensing-confusion.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/2008/08/new-licensing-confusion.html#c6039" />
    <title>Comment from Ryan Gillespie on 2008-08-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan Gillespie</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I also see the same behavior.  Last night I re-downloaded each of the files.</p>

<p>The Movable Type 4.2, Commercial License (for ProNet) does not include the Community Pack in the archive file (at least the tar).</p>

<p>The Movable Type Pro Blogger Edition does.</p>

<p>Is there a reason why the community pack is not included in the ProNet version?</p>

<p>-Ryan</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-14T19:05:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:forums.movabletype.org,2008://24.7175-comment:6041</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:forums.movabletype.org,2008://24.7175" type="text/html" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/2008/08/new-licensing-confusion.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/2008/08/new-licensing-confusion.html#c6041" />
    <title>Comment from Byrne Reese on 2008-08-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Byrne Reese</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>We should have communicated this more effectively.</p>

<p>Everyone who previously purchased Movable Type 4.0 and 4.1 Commercial License will automatically be upgraded to Movable Type 4.2 under the same terms, but without the community features. </p>

<p>But also, everyone of those people will also be offered a free upgrade to Movable Type Pro 4.2 **with** the community features. Users are free to download and install MT Pro provided that they accept the new terms of service associated with this update.</p>

<p>Given that our licensing terms now include a limit of 5000 profiles, we didn't want to put anyone in a position where by virtue of our releasing new software and them upgrading, they would be in a position where all of a sudden they would be in violation of their terms of service. That would be bad -- a lesson we learned long ago.</p>

<p>So we decided to give everyone an option to continue using Movable Type Commercial under their existing terms, while still being able to take advantage of all the security and performance enhancements we had made to the core. While also giving them an option to MT Pro under new terms.</p>

<p>That is why customers see two products in their account: Movable Type 4.2 Commercial License, and Movable Type Pro 4.2.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-14T19:26:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:forums.movabletype.org,2008://24.7175-comment:6043</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:forums.movabletype.org,2008://24.7175" type="text/html" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/2008/08/new-licensing-confusion.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/2008/08/new-licensing-confusion.html#c6043" />
    <title>Comment from jake on 2008-08-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>jake</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I still don't understand-- what if you have a currently licensed MT4.0 (+CS) or 4.1 (+CS) install with more than 5000 profiles (I run two that would currently fit into this description-- both of which support sites that are listed in the current 6A marketing materials for MT Pro)-- if I upgrade those installs to MT4Pro, am I going to be in violation of the TOS?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-14T19:34:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:forums.movabletype.org,2008://24.7175-comment:6045</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:forums.movabletype.org,2008://24.7175" type="text/html" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/2008/08/new-licensing-confusion.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/2008/08/new-licensing-confusion.html#c6045" />
    <title>Comment from Neil Epstein on 2008-08-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Neil Epstein</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that Bryne, that starts to make sense.</p>

<p>Your mention of 5000 profiles limit, caught me though. For a client we have/had Movable Type 4.2, Community Solution, Custom License.</p>

<p>Is the CS = to Pro, plugin for plugin? And does CS have a limit for 5000 Profiles? Cause on Gothamist for instance, in MT3 we have 38k profiles.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-14T19:34:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:forums.movabletype.org,2008://24.7175-comment:6047</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:forums.movabletype.org,2008://24.7175" type="text/html" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/2008/08/new-licensing-confusion.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/2008/08/new-licensing-confusion.html#c6047" />
    <title>Comment from Ryan Gillespie on 2008-08-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan Gillespie</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>So then am I to assume with the new release of MT Pro, there is no longer a "ProNet" version?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-14T19:36:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:forums.movabletype.org,2008://24.7175-comment:6051</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:forums.movabletype.org,2008://24.7175" type="text/html" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/2008/08/new-licensing-confusion.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/2008/08/new-licensing-confusion.html#c6051" />
    <title>Comment from Michele Neylon on 2008-08-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Michele Neylon</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>What counts as a profile?</p>

<p>Sorry if this is a dumb question, but if I were to setup a forum and blog / portal type thing using MT Pro and allow people to post using OpenID (among other methods of validation) do they count towards the profiles?</p>

<p>Sorry if this is an inane question, but I'm just trying to get my head around the limitations (if any)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-14T20:03:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:forums.movabletype.org,2008://24.7175-comment:6055</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:forums.movabletype.org,2008://24.7175" type="text/html" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/2008/08/new-licensing-confusion.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/2008/08/new-licensing-confusion.html#c6055" />
    <title>Comment from Michael K. Pate on 2008-08-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Michael K. Pate</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I had been experimenting with the OS version the last few months. Then I decided to I wanted the Custom Fields support only offered in the Professional Pack so I bought it.</p>

<p>Now I have downloaded and installed Movable Type Pro. I could whine about paying $100 for the Pro Pack and now getting it for free but I think that is counter-productive. :)</p>

<p>Right now, I am in the process of manually moving over all the templates out of my broken RC install (due to the Custom Fields upgrade bug) into my shiny new Pro install. And, then, hopefully, in the next few weeks, I will be able to finally re-launch the site I have been working on for the last few months.</p>

<p>So, as confusing as it all seems to be, I am still excited.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-14T21:01:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:forums.movabletype.org,2008://24.7175-comment:6079</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:forums.movabletype.org,2008://24.7175" type="text/html" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/2008/08/new-licensing-confusion.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/2008/08/new-licensing-confusion.html#c6079" />
    <title>Comment from Arvind Satyanarayan on 2008-08-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>Arvind Satyanarayan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hi Michele - currently only members with native Movable Type accounts get a profile. Thus the restriction doesn't limit the number of OpenID-authenticated members you have.  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-15T14:37:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:forums.movabletype.org,2008://24.7175-comment:6091</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:forums.movabletype.org,2008://24.7175" type="text/html" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/2008/08/new-licensing-confusion.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/2008/08/new-licensing-confusion.html#c6091" />
    <title>Comment from Ryan Gillespie on 2008-08-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan Gillespie</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>What has to happen for those with native MT accounts to get a profile?  Or to be able to start a topic?  Right now I can only apply to previously started topics.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-15T16:04:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:forums.movabletype.org,2008://24.7175-comment:6217</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:forums.movabletype.org,2008://24.7175" type="text/html" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/2008/08/new-licensing-confusion.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/2008/08/new-licensing-confusion.html#c6217" />
    <title>Comment from Michele Neylon on 2008-08-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>Michele Neylon</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hmmm.. Just been poking around my account.</p>

<p>There seems to be a limit of 5 authors with any of the downloads I'm seeing. That's kind of annoying, as I was hoping to get a few people to contribute on a couple of sites I run and thought that MT 4.2 would enable this</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-17T13:11:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:forums.movabletype.org,2008://24.7175-comment:13276</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:forums.movabletype.org,2008://24.7175" type="text/html" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/2008/08/new-licensing-confusion.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/2008/08/new-licensing-confusion.html#c13276" />
    <title>Comment from kenta on 2008-10-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>kenta</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Following Michele's post, this may be a rather inane question, but I am curious to hear the answer to Ryan's question about MT accounts and profiles.</p>

<p>The price breakdown shows the price for 5 to 20 authors and then 5000 Community Profiles with the package, but an admin can give users author roles and publishing permissions. At what point is a user or community member considered an author that needs licensing? Can a user have any sort of posting permissions without counting towards the license costs?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-10-06T19:35:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:forums.movabletype.org,2008://24.7175-comment:33752</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:forums.movabletype.org,2008://24.7175" type="text/html" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/2008/08/new-licensing-confusion.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://forums.movabletype.org/2008/08/new-licensing-confusion.html#c33752" />
    <title>Comment from trogenns on 2009-11-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>trogenns</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thanks Byrne for explaining the license better. Anything to help avoid confusion is welcome.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-24T15:53:52Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>

